linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] ata: allow subsystem to be used on m68k arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 09 Jan 2017 17:01:25 +0100
From:   Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ata: allow subsystem to be used on m68k arch


Hi,

On Sunday, January 08, 2017 02:08:23 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 06:14:36PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > * m32r: I don't know why it was restricted but it builds fine nowadays
> >   (I will fix it later in incremental patch)
> > 
> > * s390: no PATA hardware, legacy IDE subsystem is also not supported
> 
> s390 now has PCIe support, so PATA could be attached through a PCIe to
> PCI bridge in theory.  And while that is very theoretical not having
> arch ifdefs is still something we should strive for, so I'd suggest
> removing the condition entirely.

I agree.  I will do it later unless someone beats me to it.

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics