[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170109165712.GA3058@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 11:57:12 -0500
From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [HMM v15 01/16] mm/free_hot_cold_page: catch ZONE_DEVICE pages
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 08:21:25AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 01/09/2017 01:19 AM, Balbir Singh wrote:
> >> + /*
> >> + * This should never happen ! Page from ZONE_DEVICE always must have an
> >> + * active refcount. Complain about it and try to restore the refcount.
> >> + */
> >> + if (is_zone_device_page(page)) {
> >> + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(is_zone_device_page(page), page);
> > This can be VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(1, page), hopefully the compiler does the right thing
> > here. I suspect this should be a BUG_ON, independent of CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
>
> BUG_ON() means "kill the machine dead". Do we really want a guaranteed
> dead machine if someone screws up their refcounting?
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE ok with you ? It is just a safety net, i can simply drop that
patch if people have too much feeling about it.
Cheers,
Jérôme
Powered by blists - more mailing lists