[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58730600.3080802@hisilicon.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 11:39:44 +0800
From: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
Jayachandran C <jchandra@...adcom.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
jorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC: <liudongdong3@...wei.com>, <gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com>,
<xuwei5@...ilicon.com>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI/PCI: Fix bus range comparation in pci_mcfg_lookup
On 2017/1/4 15:00, Zhou Wang wrote:
> The configuration data provided by an MCFG region (ie PCI segment and
> bus range) may span multiple host bridges.
>
> Current code in pci_mcfg_lookup() carries out an exact match of host
> bridge bus range start value against the MCFG region(s) bus range start
> value which would cause configurations like the following:
>
> MCFG region:
> bus range: 0x00~0xff.
> segment: 0.
>
> PCI host bridges configuration (segment numbers and bus ranges):
> host bridge 1:
> bus range: 0x00~0x1f.
> segment: 0.
> host bridge 2:
> bus range: 0x20~0x4f.
> segment: 0.
>
> to fail, in that the bus range start value for host bridge 2 does
> not match the bus range start value of the respective MCFG region.
>
> Relax the bus range check in pci_mcfg_lookup() to cater for
> PCI configurations with multiple host bridges sharing the same
> MCFG region.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>
> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
> index a6a4cea..2944353 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
> @@ -195,11 +195,10 @@ int pci_mcfg_lookup(struct acpi_pci_root *root, struct resource *cfgres,
> goto skip_lookup;
>
> /*
> - * We expect exact match, unless MCFG entry end bus covers more than
> - * specified by caller.
> + * We expect the range in bus_res in the coverage of MCFG bus range.
> */
> list_for_each_entry(e, &pci_mcfg_list, list) {
> - if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start == bus_res->start &&
> + if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start <= bus_res->start &&
> e->bus_end >= bus_res->end) {
> root->mcfg_addr = e->addr;
> }
>
Hi Rafael,
Could you please look into this patch if you have time?
Thanks,
Zhou
Powered by blists - more mailing lists