[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbO2_fRDuuEV-aJCL7X=m7Zads=M-N_75OqBdz66YYqHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 19:31:42 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Harjani Ritesh <riteshh@...eaurora.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] mmc-core: Use kmalloc_array() in mmc_test_area_init()
On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:42 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:44:26 +0100
>
> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
> indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
> Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> * Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference
> to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
> the Linux coding style convention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Chunyan has been running this test code so she might have additional
insights to provide. I am not aware about anyone else really running the
tests, are there people who do it?
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists