[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <650c00e9-cf02-1764-5065-86f6c06817f3@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 13:49:53 -0600
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 5/5] net: qcom/emac: fix of_node and phydev leaks
On 11/24/2016 12:21 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> + if (!has_acpi_companion(&pdev->dev))
> + put_device(&adpt->phydev->mdio.dev);
I was wondering if, instead of calling put_device() only on non-ACPI systems,
would it be better if on an ACPI system I called get_device() manually? That
is, some thing like this:
int emac_phy_config(struct platform_device *pdev, struct emac_adapter *adpt)
{
...
if (has_acpi_companion(&pdev->dev)) {
...
get_device(&mii_bus->dev);
} else {
...
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists