lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170109201713.GB8668@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Mon, 9 Jan 2017 12:17:13 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] watchdog: coh901327_wdt: Simplify error handling in
 probe function

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 08:38:03PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:25 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> 
> > Checking if there is no error followed by a goto if there is one is
> > confusing. Reverse the logic.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> 
Thanks!

Guenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ