[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170109211728.GT12827@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 16:17:28 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com, axboe@...com, vgoyal@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 15/17] block: track request size in blk_issue_stat
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:33:06PM -0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> Currently there is no way to know the request size when the request is
> finished. Next patch will need this info, so add to blk_issue_stat. With
> this, we will have 49bits to track time, which still is very long time.
Not necessarily an objection but do we really need to overload the
size field? Would a normal extra field hurt too much?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists