[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170109231139.GT17126@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 15:11:39 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] PM / OPP: Add per OPP table mutex
On 12/07, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Add per OPP table lock to protect opp_table->opp_list.
>
> Note that at few places opp_list is used under the rcu_read_lock() and
> so a mutex can't be added there for now. This will be fixed by a later
> patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists