[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170109151808.f2ea647c1cf3d2cc9734a88c@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 15:18:08 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: add new mmget() helper
On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 13:32:27 +0100 Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com> wrote:
> Apart from adding the helper function itself, the rest of the kernel is
> converted mechanically using:
>
> git grep -l 'atomic_inc.*mm_users' | xargs sed -i 's/atomic_inc(&\(.*\)->mm_users);/mmget\(\1\);/'
> git grep -l 'atomic_inc.*mm_users' | xargs sed -i 's/atomic_inc(&\(.*\)\.mm_users);/mmget\(\&\1\);/'
>
> This is needed for a later patch that hooks into the helper, but might be
> a worthwhile cleanup on its own.
>
> ...
>
mmgrap() and mmget() naming is really quite confusing.
> --- a/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ void start_kernel_secondary(void)
> /* MMU, Caches, Vector Table, Interrupts etc */
> setup_processor();
>
> - atomic_inc(&mm->mm_users);
> + mmget(mm);
I wonder if mmuse() would be a bit clearer than mmget(). Although that
sounds like use_mm().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists