[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170110042858.GD6332@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 09:58:58 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] PM / OPP: Move away from RCU locking
On 09-01-17, 15:57, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> I suppose this is one thing RCU was being used for, marking OPPs
> available and then having these "getter" APIs fail if the OPPs go
> away. But that was never right because the OPP could have been
> made unavailable after this function returned and things still
> wouldn't work.
Right, it was all so confusing with RCUs in OPP library :)
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists