linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] power: supplies: bq27xxx: rename BQ27500 allow for deprecation in future.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2017 09:25:01 +1100
From:   Chris Lapa <chris@...a.com.au>
To:     Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc:     afd@...com, sre@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] power: supplies: bq27xxx: rename BQ27500 allow
 for deprecation in future.

On 10/1/17 7:58 pm, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 January 2017 16:25:29 Chris Lapa wrote:
>> From: Chris Lapa <chris@...a.com.au>
>>
>> The BQ275XX definition exists only to satisfy backwards compatibility.
>>
>> tested: yes
>
> Instead "tested: yes" we use: "Tested-by: name <email>" line.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Lapa <chris@...a.com.au>
>> Acked-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@...com>
>

Doh, I went through the log and thought I saw 'tested: yes' being used 
previously. Want me to resend?

Thanks,
Chris Lapa