[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170110085923.GD3092@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 09:59:23 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/master v4] kprobes: extable: Identify kprobes'
insn-slots as kernel text area
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:36:48AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> BTW, I think we'll have more problems with generated code if/when we
> move to an x86 DWARF unwinder, because it won't have any idea how to
> unwind past generated code. Long term I wonder if it would make sense
> to create some kind of framework for creating or registering generated
> code, so we can solve these types of problems in a single place.
Yes, this seems like a good idea. Maybe we could pull the rbtree thing
from modules and make that a more generic interface for code
registration.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists