linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] lib: Update LZ4 compressor module based on LZ4 v1.7.2.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:21:16 +0100
From:   Sven Schmidt <4sschmid@...ormatik.uni-hamburg.de>
To:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bongkyu.kim@....com,
        rsalvaterra@...il.com, sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
        davem@...emloft.net, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        anton@...msg.org, ccross@...roid.com, keescook@...omium.org,
        tony.luck@...el.com, phillip@...ashfs.org.uk,
        Sven Schmidt <4sschmid@...ormatik.uni-hamburg.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] lib: Update LZ4 compressor module based on LZ4 v1.7.2.

On 01/08/2017 12:25 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 05:55:42PM +0100, Sven Schmidt wrote:
>> This patch updates LZ4 kernel module to LZ4 v1.7.2 by Yann Collet.
>> The kernel module is inspired by the previous work by Chanho Min.
>> The updated LZ4 module will not break existing code since there were alias
>> methods added to ensure backwards compatibility.
>
> Meta-comment.  Does this update include all of the security fixes that
> we have made over the past few years to the lz4 code?  I don't want to
> be adding back insecure functions that will cause us problems.
>
> Specifically look at the changes I made in 2014 in this directory for an
> example of what I am talking about here.
>

Hi Greg,

it doesn't. I didn't have that in mind until now.
But I had a look at the related commits after I received your E-Mail and will review what I have to change
(and, obviously, do the changes :)).

Thanks,

Sven