[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170110124105.GH21598@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 12:41:05 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 00/11] CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL for arm64
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:30:50PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 01/04/2017 03:44 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 03:25:53PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >> On 01/03/2017 02:56 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >>> On 01/03/2017 09:21 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> >>>> Happy New Year!
> >>>>
> >>>> This is a very minor rebase from v5. It only moves a few headers around.
> >>>> I think this series should be ready to be queued up for 4.11.
> >>>
> >>> FWIW:
> >>>
> >>> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >>> How do we get this series included? I would like to get the ARM 32-bit
> >>> counterpart included as well (will resubmit rebased shortly), but I have
> >>> no clue which tree this should be going through.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I was assuming this would go through the arm64 tree unless Catalin/Will
> >> have an objection to that.
> >
> > Yup, I was planning to pick it up for 4.11.
> >
> > Florian -- does your series depend on this? If so, then I'll need to
> > co-ordinate with Russell (probably via a shared branch that we both pull)
> > if you're aiming for 4.11 too.
>
> Yes, pretty much everything in Laura's patch series is relevant, except
> the arm64 bits.
Ok, then. Laura -- could you please reorder your patches so that the
non-arm64 bits come first? That way, I can put those on a separate branch
and have it pulled by both arm64 and rmk, so that the prequisities are
shared between the architectures.
Thanks,
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists