[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1484011718.10361.7.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 09:28:38 +0800
From: Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
CC: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Rick Chang <rick.chang@...iatek.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Minghsiu Tsai <minghsiu.tsai@...iatek.com>,
<srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm: dts: mt2701: Add node for Mediatek JPEG
Decoder
Hi Matthias,
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 19:45 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 09/01/17 12:29, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > Hi Rick,
> >
> > On 01/06/2017 03:34 AM, Rick Chang wrote:
> >> Hi Hans,
> >>
> >> The dependence on [1] has been merged in 4.10, but [2] has not.Do you have
> >> any idea about this patch series? Should we wait for [2] or we could merge
> >> the source code and dt-binding first?
> >
> > Looking at [2] I noticed that the last comment was July 4th. What is the reason
> > it hasn't been merged yet?
> >
> > If I know [2] will be merged for 4.11, then I am fine with merging this media
> > patch series. The dependency of this patch on [2] is something Mauro can handle.
> >
> > If [2] is not merged for 4.11, then I think it is better to wait until it is
> > merged.
> >
>
> I can't take [2] because there is no scpsys in the dts present. It seems
> that it got never posted.
>
> Rick can you please follow-up with James and provide a patch which adds
> a scpsys node to the mt2701.dtsi?
>
James sent three MT2701 dts patches [1] two weeks ago, these three
patches include scpsys node. Please take a reference. And We will send
new MT2701 ionmmu/smi dtsi node patch base on [1] later, thus you can
accept and merge to 4.11.
[1]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489991/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489985/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489989/
Thanks,
Eddie
Powered by blists - more mailing lists