lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170110131512.214201485@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:38:02 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 199/206] xfs: ignore leaf attr ichdr.count in verifier during log replay

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>

commit 2e1d23370e75d7d89350d41b4ab58c7f6a0e26b2 upstream.

When we create a new attribute, we first create a shortform
attribute, and try to fit the new attribute into it.
If that fails, we copy the (empty) attribute into a leaf attribute,
and do the copy again.  Thus there can be a transient state where
we have an empty leaf attribute.

If we encounter this during log replay, the verifier will fail.
So add a test to ignore this part of the leaf attr verification
during log replay.

Thanks as usual to dchinner for spotting the problem.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c |    8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
@@ -253,6 +253,7 @@ xfs_attr3_leaf_verify(
 {
 	struct xfs_mount	*mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
 	struct xfs_attr_leafblock *leaf = bp->b_addr;
+	struct xfs_perag *pag = bp->b_pag;
 	struct xfs_attr3_icleaf_hdr ichdr;
 
 	xfs_attr3_leaf_hdr_from_disk(mp->m_attr_geo, &ichdr, leaf);
@@ -273,7 +274,12 @@ xfs_attr3_leaf_verify(
 		if (ichdr.magic != XFS_ATTR_LEAF_MAGIC)
 			return false;
 	}
-	if (ichdr.count == 0)
+	/*
+	 * In recovery there is a transient state where count == 0 is valid
+	 * because we may have transitioned an empty shortform attr to a leaf
+	 * if the attr didn't fit in shortform.
+	 */
+	if (pag && pag->pagf_init && ichdr.count == 0)
 		return false;
 
 	/* XXX: need to range check rest of attr header values */


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ