[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170110131512.214201485@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:38:02 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 199/206] xfs: ignore leaf attr ichdr.count in verifier during log replay
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
commit 2e1d23370e75d7d89350d41b4ab58c7f6a0e26b2 upstream.
When we create a new attribute, we first create a shortform
attribute, and try to fit the new attribute into it.
If that fails, we copy the (empty) attribute into a leaf attribute,
and do the copy again. Thus there can be a transient state where
we have an empty leaf attribute.
If we encounter this during log replay, the verifier will fail.
So add a test to ignore this part of the leaf attr verification
during log replay.
Thanks as usual to dchinner for spotting the problem.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
@@ -253,6 +253,7 @@ xfs_attr3_leaf_verify(
{
struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
struct xfs_attr_leafblock *leaf = bp->b_addr;
+ struct xfs_perag *pag = bp->b_pag;
struct xfs_attr3_icleaf_hdr ichdr;
xfs_attr3_leaf_hdr_from_disk(mp->m_attr_geo, &ichdr, leaf);
@@ -273,7 +274,12 @@ xfs_attr3_leaf_verify(
if (ichdr.magic != XFS_ATTR_LEAF_MAGIC)
return false;
}
- if (ichdr.count == 0)
+ /*
+ * In recovery there is a transient state where count == 0 is valid
+ * because we may have transitioned an empty shortform attr to a leaf
+ * if the attr didn't fit in shortform.
+ */
+ if (pag && pag->pagf_init && ichdr.count == 0)
return false;
/* XXX: need to range check rest of attr header values */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists