[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1484060517.2106.38.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 07:01:57 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: don't warn on every struct without
const_structs file
On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 15:03 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
>
> The script says that it won't warn:
> "No structs that should be const will be found [...]"
>
> but then that doesn't work and it warns on every single struct
> instead, since the regular expression ends up empty. Fix that
> by checking that it's not empty first.
nak.
How does const_structs end up empty for you?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists