lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:41:44 -0600
From:   Benjamin Herrenschmidt <>
To:     Guenter Roeck <>,
        Edward James <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux 2/6] hwmon: occ: Add sysfs interface

On Sat, 2017-01-07 at 09:15 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Instead of the "online" attribute, what do you think about using the
> > "bind"/"unbind" API to probe the device from user space once the system
> > is powered on? All the hwmon registration would take place in the probe
> > function, it would just occur some time after boot.
> > 
> A more common approach would be to have a platform driver. That platform
> driver would need a means to detect if the OCC is up and running, and
> instantiate everything else once it is.
> A trigger from user space is problematic because there is no guarantee
> that the OCC is really up (or that it even exists).
> An alternative might be to have the hwmon driver poll for the OCC,
> but that would be a bit more difficult and might require a kernel thread
> or maybe asynchronous probing.

Hi Guenter !

I'm not sure I agree with you here ;-)

I'm don't know how much background you got (I missed the beginning of
the discussion) but basically this driver runs on the BMC (system
controller) of the POWER9 server, the OCC is inside the POWER9 chip

So the presence/power state of the OCC doesn't depend on the BMC
platform kernel code. The BMC userspace controls power up and down to the POWER9, and thus it's the one to know whether the remote is up.

If we were to create a "platform driver", all it would do is get input
from userspace exactly like that sysfs file :-)

So if you don't like the sysfs file that registers/de-registers, which
I sort-of understand, it's a bit of a hack (though a rather efficient
one), I think the bind/unbind approach makes sense. However, I wonder
whether the simplest and most efficient (remember this BMC has a really
slow CPU) is an "online" file sysfs file, though rather than
registering/de-registering the hwmon it would simply make it stop
accessing the HW (and return some known "offline" values).


Powered by blists - more mailing lists