[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170110174311.GB24036@leverpostej>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 17:43:11 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Anurup M <anurupvasu@...il.com>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, arnd@...db.de, geert+renesas@...der.be,
davem@...emloft.net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, corbet@....net,
will.deacon@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
anurup.m@...wei.com, zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com,
tanxiaojun@...wei.com, xuwei5@...ilicon.com,
sanil.kumar@...ilicon.com, john.garry@...wei.com,
gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com, shiju.jose@...wei.com,
wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, linuxarm@...wei.com,
shyju.pv@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] perf: arm64: Support for Hisilicon SoC Hardware
event counters
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 01:47:52AM -0500, Anurup M wrote:
> ToDo:
> 1) The counter overflow handling is currently unsupported in this
> patch series.
>From a quick scan of the patches, I see mention of an interrupt in a
comment the driver, but there's noething in the DT binding.
Is there an overflow interrupt at all?
Or do you need to implement polling to avoid overflow?
This is a prerequisite for merging the driver.
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists