linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: add "rockchip, grf" property for RK3399 PMUCRU/CRU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:02:49 +0800
From:   Xing Zheng <zhengxing@...k-chips.com>
To:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>,
        Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@...k-chips.com>,
        Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>,
        David Wu <david.wu@...k-chips.com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: add "rockchip, grf" property
 for RK3399 PMUCRU/CRU

Hi Heiko,

On 2017年01月11日 09:12, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>> I just woud like to add this patch to avoid getting some unavailable
>> MUXGRF clock and need to debug it again,
>> if we support it one day in future.
> could you just check, if we have any other grf-based muxes that we may need in
> the future. Right now I only see pclkin_isp1_wrapper describing such a mux,
> but it would be cool if you could check again.
>
>
OK, we will check these.  :)

Thanks.

-- 
- Xing Zheng