linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: remove useless acpi functions in the head file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fa9e93f8-157e-b012-0e30-c621c505cc99@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:30:15 +0800
From:   Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
To:     Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
Cc:     jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: remove useless acpi functions in the head file

On 01/11/2017 10:15 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2017/1/11 9:50, Aaron Lu wrote:
>> On 01/10/2017 07:44 PM, John Garry wrote:
>>> On 10/01/2017 08:14, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
>>>>
>>>> commit f1bc1e4c44b1 ("ata: acpi: rework the ata acpi bind support")
>>>> removed scsi_register_acpi_bus_type() and scsi_unregister_acpi_bus_type(),
>>>> but forgot to remove them in the head file, do it now.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
>>
>> Just out of curiosity, did you find this by some tool? If so, can you
>> please let me know the tool name so that I can avoid such problems in
>> the future? Thanks.
> 
> No, not found by tool. I was working on a patch set which tried to
> introduce a new acpi bus type [1], so I greped the usage of
> "struct acpi_bus_type" then found this issue :)

I see, thanks for the cleanup.

Regards,
Aaron