[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170111085933.2486-3-kernel@kempniu.pl>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 09:59:31 +0100
From: Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl>
To: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@...t42.net>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: move keycode processing to separate functions
acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_notify() is pretty deeply nested, which hurts
readability. Move the keycode processing part to two separate functions
to make the code easier to understand and save a few line breaks.
Rename variable keycode_r to keycode as there is no longer any need to
differentiate between the two. Tweak indentations to make checkpatch
happy.
Signed-off-by: Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl>
---
drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
index c2022f8af51b..e57d3724d2ce 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
@@ -1030,12 +1030,48 @@ static int acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
return 0;
}
+static void acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_press(int keycode)
+{
+ struct input_dev *input = fujitsu_hotkey->input;
+ int status;
+
+ vdbg_printk(FUJLAPTOP_DBG_TRACE,
+ "Push keycode into ringbuffer [%d]\n", keycode);
+ status = kfifo_in_locked(&fujitsu_hotkey->fifo,
+ (unsigned char *)&keycode, sizeof(keycode),
+ &fujitsu_hotkey->fifo_lock);
+ if (status != sizeof(keycode)) {
+ vdbg_printk(FUJLAPTOP_DBG_WARN,
+ "Could not push keycode [0x%x]\n", keycode);
+ } else {
+ input_report_key(input, keycode, 1);
+ input_sync(input);
+ }
+}
+
+static void acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_release(void)
+{
+ struct input_dev *input = fujitsu_hotkey->input;
+ int keycode, status;
+
+ while ((status = kfifo_out_locked(&fujitsu_hotkey->fifo,
+ (unsigned char *)&keycode,
+ sizeof(keycode),
+ &fujitsu_hotkey->fifo_lock))
+ == sizeof(keycode)) {
+ input_report_key(input, keycode, 0);
+ input_sync(input);
+ vdbg_printk(FUJLAPTOP_DBG_TRACE,
+ "Pop keycode from ringbuffer [%d]\n", keycode);
+ }
+}
+
static void acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event)
{
struct input_dev *input;
- int keycode, keycode_r;
+ int keycode;
unsigned int irb = 1;
- int i, status;
+ int i;
input = fujitsu_hotkey->input;
@@ -1083,37 +1119,11 @@ static void acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event)
keycode = -1;
break;
}
- if (keycode > 0) {
- vdbg_printk(FUJLAPTOP_DBG_TRACE,
- "Push keycode into ringbuffer [%d]\n",
- keycode);
- status = kfifo_in_locked(&fujitsu_hotkey->fifo,
- (unsigned char *)&keycode,
- sizeof(keycode),
- &fujitsu_hotkey->fifo_lock);
- if (status != sizeof(keycode)) {
- vdbg_printk(FUJLAPTOP_DBG_WARN,
- "Could not push keycode [0x%x]\n",
- keycode);
- } else {
- input_report_key(input, keycode, 1);
- input_sync(input);
- }
- } else if (keycode == 0) {
- while ((status =
- kfifo_out_locked(
- &fujitsu_hotkey->fifo,
- (unsigned char *) &keycode_r,
- sizeof(keycode_r),
- &fujitsu_hotkey->fifo_lock))
- == sizeof(keycode_r)) {
- input_report_key(input, keycode_r, 0);
- input_sync(input);
- vdbg_printk(FUJLAPTOP_DBG_TRACE,
- "Pop keycode from ringbuffer [%d]\n",
- keycode_r);
- }
- }
+
+ if (keycode > 0)
+ acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_press(keycode);
+ else if (keycode == 0)
+ acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_release();
}
/* On some models (first seen on the Skylake-based Lifebook
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists