linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 3/8] rtc: add STM32 RTC driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1feb3a23-7450-2b5c-9c1c-c7ecacd7fa17@st.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2017 11:07:16 +0100
From:   Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@...com>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
CC:     Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 3/8] rtc: add STM32 RTC driver

Hi Alexandre,

On 01/11/2017 01:08 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Looks good to me, however...
>
>
> On 05/01/2017 at 14:43:24 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote :
>> +struct stm32_rtc {
>> +	struct rtc_device *rtc_dev;
>> +	void __iomem *base;
>> +	struct clk *ck_rtc;
>> +	spinlock_t lock; /* Protects registers accesses */
>
> This spinlock seems to be useless, the rtc ops_lock is already
> protecting everywhere it is taken.
>
After having a deeper look on ops_lock, it seems this one is sufficient, 
so I'll remove all spinlock uses in this driver.
>> +	int irq_alarm;
>> +};
>> +
>
> [...]
>
>> +static int stm32_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
>> +{
>> +	struct stm32_rtc *rtc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +	struct rtc_time *tm = &alrm->time;
>> +	unsigned long irqflags;
>> +	unsigned int cr, isr, alrmar;
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +	if (rtc_valid_tm(tm)) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "Alarm time not valid.\n");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>
> This will never happen, tm is already checked multiple times (up to
> three) in the core before this function can be called.
>
You're right. I'll remove all rtc_valid_tm calls.
>> +	}
>> +
>
> You don't need to resend the whole series, just this patch. I'll take
> 2/8 and 3/8, the other ones can go through the stm32 tree.
>
Thanks for reviewing. I send a v4 for this patch right now.