[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170111105012.ut6jxlmlf3qv37li@piout.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 11:50:12 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@...com>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 3/8] rtc: add STM32 RTC driver
On 11/01/2017 at 11:42:50 +0100, Amelie DELAUNAY wrote :
>
> On 01/11/2017 11:17 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 11/01/2017 at 11:07:16 +0100, Amelie DELAUNAY wrote :
> > > > This will never happen, tm is already checked multiple times (up to
> > > > three) in the core before this function can be called.
> > > >
> > > You're right. I'll remove all rtc_valid_tm calls.
> >
> > You can keep the one in read_time
> >
> Even if rtc_valid_tm is called just after rtc->ops->read_time() in
> __rtc_read_time ?
Ah yes, I forgot it was added, you can remove all of them.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists