linux-kernel - [PATCH/RESEND v2 3/5] z3fold: extend compaction function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170111160622.44ac261b12ed4778556c56dc@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2017 16:06:22 +0100
From:   Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
To:     Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH/RESEND v2 3/5] z3fold: extend compaction function

z3fold_compact_page() currently only handles the situation when
there's a single middle chunk within the z3fold page. However it
may be worth it to move middle chunk closer to either first or
last chunk, whichever is there, if the gap between them is big
enough.

This patch adds the relevant code, using BIG_CHUNK_GAP define as
a threshold for middle chunk to be worth moving.

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
---
 mm/z3fold.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/z3fold.c b/mm/z3fold.c
index 98ab01f..fca3310 100644
--- a/mm/z3fold.c
+++ b/mm/z3fold.c
@@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ static inline void *mchunk_memmove(struct z3fold_header *zhdr,
 		       zhdr->middle_chunks << CHUNK_SHIFT);
 }
 
+#define BIG_CHUNK_GAP	3
 /* Has to be called with lock held */
 static int z3fold_compact_page(struct z3fold_header *zhdr)
 {
@@ -286,8 +287,31 @@ static int z3fold_compact_page(struct z3fold_header *zhdr)
 		zhdr->middle_chunks = 0;
 		zhdr->start_middle = 0;
 		zhdr->first_num++;
+		return 1;
 	}
-	return 1;
+
+	/*
+	 * moving data is expensive, so let's only do that if
+	 * there's substantial gain (at least BIG_CHUNK_GAP chunks)
+	 */
+	if (zhdr->first_chunks != 0 && zhdr->last_chunks == 0 &&
+	    zhdr->start_middle - (zhdr->first_chunks + ZHDR_CHUNKS) >=
+			BIG_CHUNK_GAP) {
+		mchunk_memmove(zhdr, zhdr->first_chunks + 1);
+		zhdr->start_middle = zhdr->first_chunks + 1;
+		return 1;
+	} else if (zhdr->last_chunks != 0 && zhdr->first_chunks == 0 &&
+		   TOTAL_CHUNKS - (zhdr->last_chunks + zhdr->start_middle
+					+ zhdr->middle_chunks) >=
+			BIG_CHUNK_GAP) {
+		unsigned short new_start = NCHUNKS - zhdr->last_chunks -
+			zhdr->middle_chunks;
+		mchunk_memmove(zhdr, new_start);
+		zhdr->start_middle = new_start;
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.4.2