linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm: Fix broken VT switch with video=1366x768 option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170111170512.GO31595@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:05:12 +0200
From:   Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Fix broken VT switch with video=1366x768 option

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 01:41:42PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:36:50PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 12:28:36 +0100,
> > Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 03:56:14PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > I noticed that the VT switch doesn't work any longer with a Dell
> > > > laptop with 1366x768 eDP when the machine is connected with a DP
> > > > monitor.  It behaves as if VT were switched, but the graphics remain
> > > > frozen.  Actually the keyboard works, so I could switch back to VT7
> > > > again.
> > > > 
> > > > I tried to track down the problem, and encountered a long story until
> > > > we reach to this error:
> > > > 
> > > > - The machine is booted with video=1366x768 option (the distro
> > > >   installer seems to add it as default).
> > > > - Recently, drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes() deals with
> > > >   cmdline modes, and it tries to create a new mode when no
> > > >   matching mode is found.
> > > > - The drm_mode_create_from_cmdline_mode() creates a mode based on
> > > >   either CVT of GFT according to the given cmdline mode; in our case,
> > > >   it's 1366x768.
> > > > - Since both CVT and GFT can't express the width 1366 due to
> > > >   alignment, the resultant mode becomes 1368x768, slightly larger than
> > > >   the given size.
> > > > - Later on, the atomic commit is performed, and in
> > > >   drm_atomic_check_only(), the size of each plane is checked.
> > > > - The size check of 1366x768 fails due to the above, and eventually
> > > >   the whole VT switch fails.
> > > > 
> > > > Back in the history, we've had a manual fix-up of 1368x768 in various
> > > > places via c09dedb7a50e ("drm/edid: Add a workaround for 1366x768 HD
> > > > panel"), but they have been all in drm_edid.c at probing the modes
> > > > from EDID.  For addressing the problem above, we need a similar hack
> > > > to the mode newly created from cmdline, manually adjusting the width
> > > > when the expected size is 1366 while we get 1368 instead.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: eaf99c749d43 ("drm: Perform cmdline mode parsing during...")
> > > > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c | 7 +++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> > > > index ac6a35212501..e6b19bc9021a 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> > > > @@ -1460,6 +1460,13 @@ drm_mode_create_from_cmdline_mode(struct drm_device *dev,
> > > >  		return NULL;
> > > >  
> > > >  	mode->type |= DRM_MODE_TYPE_USERDEF;
> > > > +	/* fix up 1368x768: GFT/CVT can't express 1366 width due to alignment */
> > > > +	if (cmd->xres == 1366 && mode->hdisplay == 1368) {
> > > > +		mode->hdisplay = 1366;
> > > > +		mode->hsync_start--;
> > > > +		mode->hsync_end--;
> > > > +		drm_mode_set_name(mode);
> > > > +	}
> > > 
> > > Maybe give fixup_mode_1366x768() a drm_ prefix and make in non-static to
> > > avoid duplicating the code? And I guess move it to drm_modes.c?
> > 
> > Yes, that'll be a good cleanup.  I was afraid of symbol export, but
> > both are in the same module, so far.  I can post a follow-up once when
> > this one gets accepted.
> 
> For the follow up, pls put the decl into drm_crtc_internal.h, so that
> drivers aren't tempted to use it. That header is for module-internal
> shared code only.
> 
> > > Otherwise lgtm:
> > > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Thanks!
> 
> Ville, can you pls also apply this one to drm-misc-fixes?

Pushed. Thanks for the patch.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC