[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170111200857.GR13946@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 21:08:57 +0100
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, shuah@...nel.org,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, martin.wilck@...e.com,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>, hare@...e.com, rwright@....com,
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>, DSterba@...e.com,
fdmanana@...e.com, neilb@...e.com,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, rgoldwyn@...e.com,
subashab@...eaurora.org, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de>,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>, mbenes@...e.cz,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 04/10] kmod: provide wrappers for kmod_concurrent inc/dec
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 07:57:10PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:05:00AM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 01:46:25PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > On Thu 2016-12-08 22:08:59, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 12:29:42PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > > > + if (atomic_read(&kmod_concurrent) < max_modprobes)
> > > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > > + atomic_dec(&kmod_concurrent);
> > > > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static void kmod_umh_threads_put(void)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + atomic_dec(&kmod_concurrent);
> > > > > > +}
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you use a kref here instead? We're trying to kill raw use of
> > > > > atomic_t for reference counting...
> > > >
> > > > That's a much broader functional change than I was looking for, but I am up for
> > > > it. Can you describe the benefit of using kref you expect or why this is an
> > > > ongoing crusade? Since its a larger functional change how about doing this
> > > > change later, and we can test impact with the tress test driver. In theory if
> > > > there are benefits can't we add a test case to prove the gains?
> > >
> > > Kees probably refers to the kref improvements that Peter Zijlstra
> > > is working on, see
> > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161114174446.832175072@infradead.org
> > >
> > > The advantage is that the new refcount API handles over and
> > > underflow.
> > >
> > > Another advantage is that it increments/decrements the value
> > > only when it is safe. It uses cmpxchg to make sure that
> > > the checks are valid.
> >
> > Great thanks, will look into that.
>
> OK I've done the conversion now, the only thing is linux-next as of today lacks
> KREF_INIT() so I've open coded it for now. Once Peter's changes get merged the
> only thing we'dneed is to change the open code line to KREF_INIT().
>
> I'll annotate this as Suggested-by Kees and Petr, I did this as a separate atomic
> step after this to make it easier for review.
Spoke too soon, kref_read() is not upstream yet either, so I can hold conversion
over until Peter's work is merged. Peter please Cc me on those patches if possible
:D
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists