[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5cc9060f-6802-8634-f144-4637e9576ef1@mellanox.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:30:24 +0200
From: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Hadar Hen Zion <hadarh@...lanox.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [net] net/mlx5e: fix another -Wmaybe-uninitialized
warning
On 1/11/2017 11:14 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> @@ -666,14 +666,15 @@ static int mlx5e_route_lookup_ipv4(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> struct rtable *rt;
> struct neighbour *n = NULL;
> int ttl;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET)
> rt = ip_route_output_key(dev_net(mirred_dev), fl4);
> - if (IS_ERR(rt))
> - return PTR_ERR(rt);
> -#else
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -#endif
> + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(rt);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
but this means that if we got NULL from ip_route_output_key, we will
return success (0) here which is wrong.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists