linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] wext: handle NULL exta data in iwe_stream_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1484210226.5391.1.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Thu, 12 Jan 2017 09:37:06 +0100
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wext: handle NULL exta data in iwe_stream_add_point
 better

On Wed, 2017-01-11 at 21:39 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 11, 2017 4:06:17 PM CET Johannes Berg wrote:
> > 
> > Applied. Also fixed the typo in the subject :)
> 
> Thanks! Unfortunately I now got another warning for the same
> function, and though I would have expected the patch to fix it, that
> did not work:

I've come to expect better of you (i.e. testing your own patches) ;-)


Come to think of it, I'm thinking I should drop this patch and the
driver should just use iwe_stream_add_event() instead? It'll be
somewhat tricky to get the length correct though.

Alternatively, perhaps we should just uninline all the crap and then
the compiler can't bother us :)

johannes