[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170112084738.GA26769@localhost>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 09:47:38 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Roman Sommer <roman.sommer@....de>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...cs.fau.de,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
Christian Bewermeyer <christian.bewermeyer@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: greybus: checkpatch: Change parameter type
unsigned to unsigned int
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 10:05:10AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 04:00:35PM +0100, Roman Sommer wrote:
> > Note that this patch does not fix all checkpatch warnings for the
> > affected files.
> >
>
> A lot of ways that display git commits put the changelog and the summary
> far apart. The changelog is pretty useless by itself in this case.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/11/308
>
> See how it puts the date in between? marc.info is even worse but google
> hasn't indexed it yet and I'm too lazy to look it up. So people read
> the summary or the changelog but not necessarily both.
Yeah, let's do this right.
Roman, could you resend this with a self-contained commit message, and a
more compact summary (Subject) as I suggested earlier?
Thanks,
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists