[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170112094733.GC3006@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:17:33 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
To: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Shreyas B. Prabhu" <shreyasbp@...il.com>,
Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stewart Smith <stewart@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, mark.rutland@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] powernv:stop: Uniformly rename power9 to arch300
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:37:01PM +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Balbir pointed out that in idle_book3s.S and powernv/idle.c some
> functions and variables had power9 in their names while some others
> had arch300.
>
I would prefer power9 to arch300
Balbir Singh.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists