linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/3] mtd/ftl: Use kmalloc_array() in build

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b379ba57-d926-2572-17ec-5bbe166b0e37@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:35:19 +0100
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] mtd/ftl: Use kmalloc_array() in build_maps()

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:42:25 +0100

* Multiplications for the size determination of memory allocations
  indicated that array data structures should be processed.
  Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".

  This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

* Replace the specification of data types by pointer dereferences
  to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
  the Linux coding style convention.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/mtd/ftl.c | 13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ftl.c b/drivers/mtd/ftl.c
index 9fb3b0dcdac2..ef2f38b6a837 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ftl.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ftl.c
@@ -207,15 +207,14 @@ static int build_maps(partition_t *part)
     /* Set up erase unit maps */
     part->DataUnits = le16_to_cpu(part->header.NumEraseUnits) -
 	part->header.NumTransferUnits;
-    part->EUNInfo = kmalloc(part->DataUnits * sizeof(struct eun_info_t),
-			    GFP_KERNEL);
+	part->EUNInfo = kmalloc_array(part->DataUnits, sizeof(*part->EUNInfo),
+				      GFP_KERNEL);
     if (!part->EUNInfo)
 	    goto out;
     for (i = 0; i < part->DataUnits; i++)
 	part->EUNInfo[i].Offset = 0xffffffff;
-    part->XferInfo =
-	kmalloc(part->header.NumTransferUnits * sizeof(struct xfer_info_t),
-		GFP_KERNEL);
+	part->XferInfo = kmalloc_array(part->header.NumTransferUnits,
+				       sizeof(*part->XferInfo), GFP_KERNEL);
     if (!part->XferInfo)
 	    goto out_EUNInfo;
 
@@ -275,8 +274,8 @@ static int build_maps(partition_t *part)
     memset(part->VirtualBlockMap, 0xff, blocks * sizeof(uint32_t));
     part->BlocksPerUnit = (1 << header.EraseUnitSize) >> header.BlockSize;
 
-    part->bam_cache = kmalloc(part->BlocksPerUnit * sizeof(uint32_t),
-			      GFP_KERNEL);
+	part->bam_cache = kmalloc_array(part->BlocksPerUnit,
+					sizeof(*part->bam_cache), GFP_KERNEL);
     if (!part->bam_cache)
 	    goto out_VirtualBlockMap;
 
-- 
2.11.0