lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:15:50 +0100
From:   Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>
To:     Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Cc:     Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, hpa@...or.com,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        mika.penttila@...tfour.com, bhsharma@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] efi/x86: make efi_memmap_reserve only insert into boot mem areas

Hi Dave,

On Thu, Jan 12 2017, Dave Young wrote:

> efi_mem_reserve cares only about boot services regions and maybe loader areas.
> So add a new argument to efi_memmap_insert for this purpose.

Please see below.


> --- linux-x86.orig/drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c
> +++ linux-x86/drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c
> @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ int __init efi_memmap_split_count(efi_me
>   * to see how large @buf needs to be.
>   */
>  void __init efi_memmap_insert(struct efi_memory_map *old_memmap, void *buf,
> -			      struct efi_mem_range *mem)
> +			      struct efi_mem_range *mem, bool boot_only)
>  {
>  	u64 m_start, m_end, m_attr;
>  	efi_memory_desc_t *md;
> @@ -246,6 +246,12 @@ void __init efi_memmap_insert(struct efi
>  		start = md->phys_addr;
>  		end = md->phys_addr + (md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT) - 1;
>  
> +		if (boot_only && !(md->type == EFI_LOADER_DATA ||
> +		    md->type == EFI_LOADER_CODE ||
> +		    md->type == EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_CODE ||
> +		    md->type == EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA))
> +			continue;
> +


Actually, the efi_mem_desc_lookup() called from
efi_arch_memmap_reserve() will only return mds not satisfying the
following condition:

  if (!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME) &&
      md->type != EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA &&
      md->type != EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA) {
  	continue;
  }

Furthermore, efi_arch_mem_reserve() will only accept ranges fully
contained within such a region.

I think we can make efi_arch_mem_reserve() return early if
EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME has been set already and thus, neglect this case in
efi_memmap_insert().

I suppose that we don't want to reserve within EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA
regions in efi_mem_reserve() either -- these won't ever get made
available as general memory anyway [1]. So efi_arch_mem_reserve() should
return early here as well imo.

So, what would remain to be handled from efi_memmap_insert() in case of
boot_only would be EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA only?

(As a sidenote, Matt pointed out at [1] that the EFI_LOADER_* regions
 should be reserved early through memblock_reserve() and not through
 efi_mem_reserve()).

Thanks,

Nicolai


[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170109130702.GI16838@codeblueprint.co.uk

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ