lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17625a3f-5598-d83d-44a1-316ccc917ad5@grimberg.me>
Date:   Thu, 12 Jan 2017 17:09:23 +0200
From:   Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
To:     Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>, lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, songliubraving@...com,
        pawel.baldysiak@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>,
        "open list:SOFTWARE RAID (Multiple Disks) SUPPORT" 
        <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>, artur.paszkiewicz@...el.com,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
        Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@...e.com>, Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com,
        mariusz.dabrowski@...el.com, Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM TOPIC] [LSF/MM ATTEND] md raid general
 discussion

Hey Coly,

> Also I receive reports from users that raid1 performance is desired when
> it is built on NVMe SSDs as a cache (maybe bcache or dm-cache). I am
> working on some raid1 performance improvement (e.g. new raid1 I/O
> barrier and lockless raid1 I/O submit), and have some more ideas to discuss.

Do you have some performance measurements to share?

Mike used null devices to simulate very fast devices which
led to nice performance enhancements in dm-multipath code.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ