[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170112151806.2btvh64k44eud4fr@treble>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 09:18:06 -0600
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: x86-64: Maintain 16-byte stack alignment
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:06:50PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 09:03:18AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> >
> > For the entry code, could we just replace all calls with CALL_ALIGNED?
> > That might be less intrusive than trying to adjust all the pt_regs
> > accesses.
> >
> > Then to ensure that nobody ever uses 'call' directly:
> >
> > '#define call please-use-CALL-ALIGNED-instead-of-call'
> >
> > I think that would be possible if CALL_ALIGNED were a ".macro".
>
> The trouble with that is that you have got things like TRACE_IRQS_OFF
> which are also used outside of the entry code.
Where? As far as I can tell, TRACE_IRQS_OFF is used exclusively by entry
code.
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists