linux-kernel - Re: sysfs deferred

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 12 Jan 2017 18:41:42 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Subject: Re: sysfs deferred_probe attribute

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:27:01AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> I just noticed that we have a new device attribute 'deferred_probe'
> added in 4.10 with this commit:
> 
> commit 6751667a29d6fd64afb9ce30567ad616b68ed789
> Author: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
> Date:   Tue Aug 16 14:34:18 2016 +0100
> 
>     driver core: Add deferred_probe attribute to devices in sysfs
> 
>     It is sometimes useful to know that a device is on the deferred probe
>     list rather than, say, not having a driver available.  Expose this
>     information to user-space.
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
>     Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> 
> 
> It seems like a bad idea to add an ABI for an internal kernel feature.
> When/if we replace deferred probe with something better based on
> functional dependencies are we going to keep this attr around? Or
> remove it and assume no userspace uses it? Perhaps it should be hidden
> behind CONFIG_DEBUG or just make a debugfs file that lists the
> deferred list. Then you wouldn't have to hunt for what got deferred.

Ah, debugfs would be nice, I'd much prefer that.  I don't know how Ben
is using this, but I think that would make more sense to me.

thanks,

greg k-h