[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6bd0d2fe-f979-a4dc-7c4d-54036f4d37f8@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 19:12:06 +0100
From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
To: tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Christophe Ricard <christophe.ricard@...il.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Subject: [PATCH] tpm_tis: fix iTPM probe via probe_itpm() function
probe_itpm() function is supposed to send command without an itpm flag set
and if this fails to repeat it, this time with the itpm flag set.
However, commit 41a5e1cf1fe15 ("tpm/tpm_tis: Split tpm_tis driver into a
core and TCG TIS compliant phy") moved the itpm flag from an "itpm"
variable to a TPM_TIS_ITPM_POSSIBLE chip flag, so setting the
(now function-local) itpm variable no longer had any effect.
Finally, this function-local itpm variable was removed by
commit 56af322156dbe9 ("tpm/tpm_tis: remove unused itpm variable")
Tested only on non-iTPM TIS TPM.
Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
Fixes: 41a5e1cf1fe15 ("Split tpm_tis driver into a core and TCG TIS compliant phy")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
index e42e5a6a3c2f..401f1228547c 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
@@ -467,6 +467,9 @@ static int probe_itpm(struct tpm_chip *chip)
size_t len = sizeof(cmd_getticks);
u16 vendor;
+ if (priv->flags & TPM_TIS_ITPM_POSSIBLE)
+ return 0;
+
rc = tpm_tis_read16(priv, TPM_DID_VID(0), &vendor);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
@@ -482,12 +485,15 @@ static int probe_itpm(struct tpm_chip *chip)
tpm_tis_ready(chip);
release_locality(chip, priv->locality, 0);
+ priv->flags |= TPM_TIS_ITPM_POSSIBLE;
+
rc = tpm_tis_send_data(chip, cmd_getticks, len);
- if (rc == 0) {
+ if (rc == 0)
dev_info(&chip->dev, "Detected an iTPM.\n");
- rc = 1;
- } else
+ else {
+ priv->flags &= ~TPM_TIS_ITPM_POSSIBLE;
rc = -EFAULT;
+ }
out:
tpm_tis_ready(chip);
@@ -743,15 +749,10 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq,
(chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) ? "2.0" : "1.2",
vendor >> 16, rid);
- if (!(priv->flags & TPM_TIS_ITPM_POSSIBLE)) {
- probe = probe_itpm(chip);
- if (probe < 0) {
- rc = -ENODEV;
- goto out_err;
- }
-
- if (!!probe)
- priv->flags |= TPM_TIS_ITPM_POSSIBLE;
+ probe = probe_itpm(chip);
+ if (probe < 0) {
+ rc = -ENODEV;
+ goto out_err;
}
/* Figure out the capabilities */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists