linux-kernel - [PATCH] mm, vmscan: do not count freed pages as PGDEACTIVATE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:12:21 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm, vmscan: do not count freed pages as PGDEACTIVATE

From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>

PGDEACTIVATE represents the number of pages moved from the active list
to the inactive list. At least this sounds like the original motivation
of the counter. move_active_pages_to_lru, however, counts pages which
got freed in the mean time as deactivated as well. This is a very rare
event and counting them as deactivation in itself is not harmful but it
makes the code more convoluted than necessary - we have to count both
all pages and those which are freed which is a bit confusing.

After this patch the PGDEACTIVATE should have a slightly more clear
semantic and only count those pages which are moved from the active to
the inactive list which is a plus.

Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
---
Hi,
Vlastimil has pointed out [1] that move_active_pages_to_lru is more
confusing than necessary because we count two things, pgmoved and
nr_moved. I believe that counting freed pages as PGDEACTIVATE is more
confusing than helpful. I doubt that this patch will make any real
difference in the real life but it at least makes the code easier which
is a plus so I think this is more a cleanup than any bug fix.

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/646c3551-e794-611c-5247-490bd89133db@suse.cz

 mm/vmscan.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index cf940af609fd..7e1c3cd91fab 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1878,7 +1878,6 @@ static unsigned move_active_pages_to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec,
 				     enum lru_list lru)
 {
 	struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
-	unsigned long pgmoved = 0;
 	struct page *page;
 	int nr_pages;
 	int nr_moved = 0;
@@ -1893,7 +1892,6 @@ static unsigned move_active_pages_to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec,
 		nr_pages = hpage_nr_pages(page);
 		update_lru_size(lruvec, lru, page_zonenum(page), nr_pages);
 		list_move(&page->lru, &lruvec->lists[lru]);
-		pgmoved += nr_pages;
 
 		if (put_page_testzero(page)) {
 			__ClearPageLRU(page);
@@ -1913,7 +1911,7 @@ static unsigned move_active_pages_to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec,
 	}
 
 	if (!is_active_lru(lru))
-		__count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, pgmoved);
+		__count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, nr_moved);
 
 	return nr_moved;
 }
-- 
2.11.0