lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3436f495-1c2b-b80b-2c0c-6956391bd43f@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Thu, 12 Jan 2017 14:56:12 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: stm32f4: avoid uninitialized variable access

On 01/12/2017 02:42 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> Applied to clk-next. Seems I need to update my compiler to find
>> these warnings.
> I'm currently playing with gcc-7, which adds a lot of new warnings
> (including many false positives). gcc-6 was supposed to have better
> warnings than 5, but I didn't find the difference that noticeable. 5
> or 6 is probably best at the moment, and if you have at least 4.9
> there is no urgent need to upgrade.

Thanks. I'm on gcc-4.7. It's been a long time since I upgraded my cross
compiler.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ