linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] dmaengine: xilinx_dma: Fix race condition in the driver for multiple descriptor scenario

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170113062225.GR3573@localhost>
Date:   Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:52:25 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:     Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appana.durga.rao@...inx.com>
Cc:     "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "michal.simek@...inx.com" <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        Soren Brinkmann <sorenb@...inx.com>,
        "moritz.fischer@...us.com" <moritz.fischer@...us.com>,
        "laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com" 
        <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        "luis@...ethencourt.com" <luis@...ethencourt.com>,
        "Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com" <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
        "dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] dmaengine: xilinx_dma: Fix race condition in the
 driver for multiple descriptor scenario

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 06:00:44AM +0000, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> 	Thanks for the review...
> 
> [Snip]
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 12:15:30PM +0530, Kedareswara rao Appana wrote:
> > > > > When driver is handling AXI DMA SoftIP When user submits multiple
> > > > > descriptors back to back on the S2MM(recv) side with the current
> > > > > driver flow the last buffer descriptor next bd points to a invalid
> > > > > location resulting the invalid data or errors in the DMA engine.
> > > >
> > > > Can you rephrase this, it a bit hard to understand.
> > >
> > > When DMA is receiving packets h/w expects the descriptors Should be in
> > > the form of a ring (I mean h/w buffer descriptor Next descriptor field
> > > should always point to valid address So that when DMA engine go and
> > > fetch that next descriptor it always Sees a valid address).
> > >
> > >
> > > But with the current driver implementation when user queues Multiple
> > > descriptors the last descriptor next descriptor field Pointing to an
> > > invalid location causing data corruption or Errors from the DMA h/w
> > > engine...
> > >
> > > To avoid this issue creating a Buffer descriptor Chain during Channel
> > > allocation and using those buffer descriptors for processing User
> > > requested data.
> > 
> > Is it not doable to to modify the next pointer to point to subsequent transaction.
> > IOW you are modifying tail descriptor to point to subsequent descriptor.
> > 
> > Btw how and when does DMA stop, assuming it is circular it never would, isn't
> > there a valid/stop flag associated with a descriptor which tells DMA engine what
> > to do next
> 
> There are two registers that controls the DMA transfers.
> Current descriptor and tail descriptor register. 
> When current descriptor reaches tail descriptor dma engine will pause.
> 
> When reprogramming the tail descriptor the DMA engine will starts fetching descriptors again.
> 
> But with the existing driver flow if we reprogram the tail descriptor
> The tail descriptor next descriptor field is pointing to an invalid location
> Causing data corruption...

So the solution is..?

> > Btw there is something wrong with your MUA perhaps line are titlecased for no
> > reason. This is typically behavious of non linux tool which may not be great tool
> > for this work.
> 
> Thanks for pointing it out.
> I usually replies from outlook from a windows machine.
> Will check with others in my team how they configured their mail client.

Yeah that isnt right tool for the job. See
Documentation/process/email-clients.rst

FWIW, I use mutt, vim as editor with exchange servers, seems to work well
for me now.

-- 
~Vinod