[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8c39d9d6-2e70-0986-7f81-90fbd394af42@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:22:05 +0530
From: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Jike Song <jike.song@...el.com>
CC: <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, <serge@...lyn.com>,
<kraxel@...hat.com>, <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v2 2/2] vfio iommu type1: fix the testing of capability for
remote task
Looks good to me
Reviewed by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>
On 1/13/2017 3:52 AM, James Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2017, Jike Song wrote:
>
>> Before the mdev enhancement type1 iommu used capable() to test the
>> capability of current task; in the course of mdev development a
>> new requirement, testing for another task other than current, was
>> raised. ns_capable() was used for this purpose, however it still
>> tests current, the only difference is, in a specified namespace.
>>
>> Fix it by using has_capability() instead, which tests the cap for
>> specified task in init_user_ns, the same namespace as capable().
>>
>> Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>
>> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jike Song <jike.song@...el.com>
>
>
> Reviewed-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> index 9266271..77373e5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> @@ -495,8 +495,7 @@ static int vfio_pin_page_external(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
>> unsigned long *pfn_base, bool do_accounting)
>> {
>> unsigned long limit;
>> - bool lock_cap = ns_capable(task_active_pid_ns(dma->task)->user_ns,
>> - CAP_IPC_LOCK);
>> + bool lock_cap = has_capability(dma->task, CAP_IPC_LOCK);
>> struct mm_struct *mm;
>> int ret;
>> bool rsvd;
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists