[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170113081015.GA5328@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:10:23 +0800
From: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...tfour.com>,
bhsharma@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] efi/x86: make efi_memmap_reserve only insert into
boot mem areas
On 01/13/17 at 05:20am, Dave Young wrote:
> On 01/12/17 at 04:15pm, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > Hello Dave,
> >
> > On 12 January 2017 at 09:41, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > There are memory ranges like below when I testing early efi_mem_reserve:
> > >
> > > efi: mem62: [Reserved | | | | | | | | | | | | ] range=[0x0000000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff] (0MB)
> > > efi: mem63: [Reserved | | | | | | | | | | | | ] range=[0x0000000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff] (0MB)
> > > efi: mem64: [Reserved | | | | | | | | | | | | ] range=[0x0000000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff] (0MB)
> > > efi: mem65: [Reserved | | | | | | | | | | | | ] range=[0x0000000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff] (0MB)
> > > efi: mem66: [Reserved | | | | | | | | | | | | ] range=[0x0000000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff] (0MB)
> > > efi: mem67: [Reserved | | | | | | | | | | | | ] range=[0x0000000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff] (0MB)
> > >
> >
> > Did you spot Peter's patch to prune invalid memmap entries?
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/efi/efi.git/commit/?h=next&id=b2a91a35445229
> >
> > I would expect this patch to no longer be necessary with that in place, no?
>
> Ard, good suggestion, I did not notice that patch, will try. Actually
> I'm not sure about fake_mem handling, if we can filter out the invalid
> ranges then it will be natural to drop this one after a test.
The commit works for me. I updated the series.
I addressed comments known, moved patch 1 to 4/4 with only boot service
(dropped loader areas checking), I plan to send them out next Monday
see if there are more comments.
If anyone who want to try them now, feel free to download from below url:
http://people.redhat.com/~ruyang/efi-bgrt/
Thanks
Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists