[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170113084513.wvuxkanrlmgz3ang@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:45:13 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: M'boumba Cedric Madianga <cedric.madianga@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/5] i2c: Add STM32F4 I2C driver
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 09:29:03AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > (But note that this is irrelevant for the patch as the driver doesn't
> > claim to support this kind of transfer.)
>
> Yes, I wanted to mention that, too.
>
> I'd think the series is good to go in?
AFAICT there are some unaddressed comments that Cedrics claimed to fix
before our discussion was dominated by block transfers.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists