| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5850a4ad-74a1-8d30-e865-fbd35679e84f@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:04:57 +0100
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Cc: osandov@...ndov.com, bart.vanassche@...disk.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v6] blk-mq scheduling framework
On 01/13/2017 09:15 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 01/11/2017 10:39 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Another year, another posting of this patchset. The previous posting
>> was here:
>>
>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2406106.html
>>
>> (yes, I've skipped v5, it was fixes on top of v4, not the rework).
>>
>> I've reworked bits of this to get rid of the shadow requests, thanks
>> to Bart for the inspiration. The missing piece, for me, was the fact
>> that we have the tags->rqs[] indirection array already. I've done this
>> somewhat differently, though, by having the internal scheduler tag
>> map be allocated/torn down when an IO scheduler is attached or
>> detached. This also means that when we run without a scheduler, we
>> don't have to do double tag allocations, it'll work like before.
>>
>> The patchset applies on top of 4.10-rc3, or can be pulled here:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block blk-mq-sched.6
>>
> Well ... something's wrong here on my machine:
>
> [ 39.886886] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 39.886895] WARNING: CPU: 9 PID: 62 at block/blk-mq.c:342
> __blk_mq_finish_request+0x124/0x140
> [ 39.886895] Modules linked in: sd_mod ahci uhci_hcd ehci_pci
> mpt3sas(+) libahci ehci_hcd serio_raw crc32c_intel raid_class drm libata
> usbcore hpsa usb_common scsi_transport_sas sg dm_multipath dm_mod
> scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh_emc scsi_dh_alua autofs4
> [ 39.886910] CPU: 9 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/u130:0 Not tainted
> 4.10.0-rc3+ #528
> [ 39.886911] Hardware name: HP ProLiant ML350p Gen8, BIOS P72 09/08/2013
> [ 39.886917] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
> [ 39.886918] Call Trace:
> [ 39.886923] dump_stack+0x85/0xc9
> [ 39.886927] __warn+0xd1/0xf0
> [ 39.886928] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
> [ 39.886930] __blk_mq_finish_request+0x124/0x140
> [ 39.886932] blk_mq_finish_request+0x55/0x60
> [ 39.886934] blk_mq_sched_put_request+0x78/0x80
> [ 39.886936] blk_mq_free_request+0xe/0x10
> [ 39.886938] blk_put_request+0x25/0x60
> [ 39.886944] __scsi_execute.isra.24+0x104/0x160
> [ 39.886946] scsi_execute_req_flags+0x94/0x100
> [ 39.886948] scsi_report_opcode+0xab/0x100
>
> checking ...
>
Ah.
Seems like the elevator switch races with device setup:
1188.490326] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 1188.490334] WARNING: CPU: 9 PID: 30155 at block/blk-mq.c:342
__blk_mq_finish_request+0x172/0x180
[ 1188.490335] Modules linked in: mpt3sas(+) raid_class rpcsec_gss_krb5
auth_rpcgss nfsv4 nfs lockd grace fscache ebtable_filt
er ebtables ip6table_filter ip6_tables iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables
af_packet br_netfilter bridge stp llc iscsi_ibft iscs
i_boot_sysfs sb_edac edac_core x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp
coretemp kvm_intel kvm irqbypass crct10dif_pclmul crc32_p
clmul tg3 ixgbe ghash_clmulni_intel pcbc ptp aesni_intel pps_core
aes_x86_64 ipmi_ssif hpilo hpwdt mdio libphy pcc_cpufreq cry
pto_simd glue_helper iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis
ipmi_si ipmi_devintf cryptd lpc_ich pcspkr ioatdma tpm_
tis_core thermal wmi shpchp dca ipmi_msghandler tpm fjes button sunrpc
btrfs xor sr_mod raid6_pq cdrom ehci_pci mgag200 i2c_al
go_bit drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect uhci_hcd
[ 1188.490399] sysimgblt fb_sys_fops sd_mod ahci ehci_hcd ttm libahci
crc32c_intel serio_raw drm libata usbcore usb_common hp
sa scsi_transport_sas sg dm_multipath dm_mod scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh_emc
scsi_dh_alua autofs4
[ 1188.490411] CPU: 9 PID: 30155 Comm: kworker/u130:6 Not tainted
4.10.0-rc3+ #535
[ 1188.490411] Hardware name: HP ProLiant ML350p Gen8, BIOS P72 09/08/2013
[ 1188.490425] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
[ 1188.490427] Call Trace:
[ 1188.490433] dump_stack+0x85/0xc9
[ 1188.490436] __warn+0xd1/0xf0
[ 1188.490438] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
[ 1188.490440] __blk_mq_finish_request+0x172/0x180
[ 1188.490442] blk_mq_finish_request+0x55/0x60
[ 1188.490443] blk_mq_sched_put_request+0x78/0x80
[ 1188.490445] blk_mq_free_request+0xe/0x10
[ 1188.490448] blk_put_request+0x25/0x60
[ 1188.490453] __scsi_execute.isra.24+0x104/0x160
[ 1188.490455] scsi_execute_req_flags+0x94/0x100
[ 1188.490457] scsi_report_opcode+0xab/0x100
[ 1188.490461] sd_revalidate_disk+0xaef/0x1450 [sd_mod]
[ 1188.490464] sd_probe_async+0xd1/0x1d0 [sd_mod]
[ 1188.490466] async_run_entry_fn+0x37/0x150
[ 1188.490470] process_one_work+0x1d0/0x660
[ 1188.490472] ? process_one_work+0x151/0x660
[ 1188.490474] worker_thread+0x12b/0x4a0
[ 1188.490475] kthread+0x10c/0x140
[ 1188.490477] ? process_one_work+0x660/0x660
[ 1188.490478] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
[ 1188.490483] ret_from_fork+0x2a/0x40
[ 1188.490484] ---[ end trace d5e3a32ac269fc2a ]---
[ 1188.490485] rq (487/52) rqs (-1/-1)
[ 1188.523518] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk
[ 1188.540954] elevator: switch to deadline failed
(The 'rqs' line is a debug output from me:
struct request *rqs_rq =
hctx->tags->rqs[rq->tag];
printk(KERN_WARNING "rq (%d/%d) rqs (%d/%d)\n",
rq->tag, sched_tag,
rqs_rq ? rqs_rq->tag : -1,
rqs_rq ? rqs_rq->internal_tag : -1);
telling us that request with 'tag' 487 is _not_ at position
487 in the rqs array; rather that position is empty.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@...e.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists