linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Wait for oom

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:14:49 +0100
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
        mhocko@...e.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Wait for oom_lock before retrying.

On Fri 2017-01-13 11:52:55, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (01/12/17 14:10), Petr Mladek wrote:
> [..]
> > >  /**
> > >   * console_lock - lock the console system for exclusive use.
> > >   *
> > > @@ -2316,7 +2321,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(console_unlock);
> > >   */
> > >  void __sched console_conditional_schedule(void)
> > >  {
> > > -	if (console_may_schedule)
> > > +	if (get_console_may_schedule())
> > 
> > Note that console_may_schedule should be zero when
> > the console drivers are called. See the following lines in
> > console_unlock():
> > 
> > 	/*
> > 	 * Console drivers are called under logbuf_lock, so
> > 	 * @console_may_schedule should be cleared before; however, we may
> > 	 * end up dumping a lot of lines, for example, if called from
> > 	 * console registration path, and should invoke cond_resched()
> > 	 * between lines if allowable.  Not doing so can cause a very long
> > 	 * scheduling stall on a slow console leading to RCU stall and
> > 	 * softlockup warnings which exacerbate the issue with more
> > 	 * messages practically incapacitating the system.
> > 	 */
> > 	do_cond_resched = console_may_schedule;
> > 	console_may_schedule = 0;
> 
> 
> 
> console drivers are never-ever-ever getting called under logbuf lock.
> never. with disabled local IRQs - yes. under logbuf lock - no. that
> would soft lockup systems in really bad ways, otherwise.

Sure. It is just a misleading comment that someone wrote. I have
already fixed this in my patch.


> the reason why we set console_may_schedule to zero in
> console_unlock() is.... VT. and lf() function in particular.
> 
> commit 78944e549d36673eb6265a2411574e79c28e23dc
> Author: Antonino A. Daplas XXXX
> Date:   Sat Aug 5 12:14:16 2006 -0700
> 
>     [PATCH] vt: printk: Fix framebuffer console triggering might_sleep assertion
>     
>     Reported by: Dave Jones
>     
>     Whilst printk'ing to both console and serial console, I got this...
>     (2.6.18rc1)
>     
>     BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/sched.c:4438
>     in_atomic():0, irqs_disabled():1

This is basically the same problem that Testuo has. This commit added
the line

	console_may_schedule = 0;

Tetsuo found that we did not clear it when going back
via the "again:" goto target.


> and we really don't want to cond_resched() when we are in panic.
> that's why console_flush_on_panic() sets it to zero explicitly.

This actually works even with the bug. console_flush_on_panic()
is called with interrupts disabled in panic(). Therefore
console_trylock would disable cond_resched.

Best Regards,
Petr