linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Wait for oom

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170113115024.GA16506@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date:   Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:50:24 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
        mhocko@...e.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Wait for oom_lock before retrying.

On (01/13/17 12:03), Petr Mladek wrote:
[..]
> > why can't we?
> 
> Because it would newer call cond_resched() in non-preemptive kernel
> with CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT disabled. IMHO, we want to call it,
> for example, when we scroll the entire screen from tty_operations.
> 
> Or do I miss anything?

so... basically. it has never called cond_resched() there. right?
why is this suddenly a problem now?

	-ss