[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170113123829.GD9036@marvin.atrad.com.au>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 23:08:29 +1030
From: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@...t42.net>
To: Micha?? K??pie?? <kernel@...pniu.pl>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: move keycode
processing to separate functions
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 09:59:31AM +0100, Micha?? K??pie?? wrote:
> acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_notify() is pretty deeply nested, which hurts
> readability. Move the keycode processing part to two separate functions
> to make the code easier to understand and save a few line breaks.
> Rename variable keycode_r to keycode as there is no longer any need to
> differentiate between the two. Tweak indentations to make checkpatch
> happy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Micha?? K??pie?? <kernel@...pniu.pl>
Acked-by: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@...t42.net>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> index c2022f8af51b..e57d3724d2ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> @@ -1030,12 +1030,48 @@ static int acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_press(int keycode)
> +{
> + struct input_dev *input = fujitsu_hotkey->input;
> + int status;
> +
> + vdbg_printk(FUJLAPTOP_DBG_TRACE,
> + "Push keycode into ringbuffer [%d]\n", keycode);
> + status = kfifo_in_locked(&fujitsu_hotkey->fifo,
> + (unsigned char *)&keycode, sizeof(keycode),
> + &fujitsu_hotkey->fifo_lock);
> + if (status != sizeof(keycode)) {
> + vdbg_printk(FUJLAPTOP_DBG_WARN,
> + "Could not push keycode [0x%x]\n", keycode);
> + } else {
> + input_report_key(input, keycode, 1);
> + input_sync(input);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_release(void)
> +{
> + struct input_dev *input = fujitsu_hotkey->input;
> + int keycode, status;
> +
> + while ((status = kfifo_out_locked(&fujitsu_hotkey->fifo,
> + (unsigned char *)&keycode,
> + sizeof(keycode),
> + &fujitsu_hotkey->fifo_lock))
> + == sizeof(keycode)) {
> + input_report_key(input, keycode, 0);
> + input_sync(input);
> + vdbg_printk(FUJLAPTOP_DBG_TRACE,
> + "Pop keycode from ringbuffer [%d]\n", keycode);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event)
> {
> struct input_dev *input;
> - int keycode, keycode_r;
> + int keycode;
> unsigned int irb = 1;
> - int i, status;
> + int i;
>
> input = fujitsu_hotkey->input;
>
> @@ -1083,37 +1119,11 @@ static void acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event)
> keycode = -1;
> break;
> }
> - if (keycode > 0) {
> - vdbg_printk(FUJLAPTOP_DBG_TRACE,
> - "Push keycode into ringbuffer [%d]\n",
> - keycode);
> - status = kfifo_in_locked(&fujitsu_hotkey->fifo,
> - (unsigned char *)&keycode,
> - sizeof(keycode),
> - &fujitsu_hotkey->fifo_lock);
> - if (status != sizeof(keycode)) {
> - vdbg_printk(FUJLAPTOP_DBG_WARN,
> - "Could not push keycode [0x%x]\n",
> - keycode);
> - } else {
> - input_report_key(input, keycode, 1);
> - input_sync(input);
> - }
> - } else if (keycode == 0) {
> - while ((status =
> - kfifo_out_locked(
> - &fujitsu_hotkey->fifo,
> - (unsigned char *) &keycode_r,
> - sizeof(keycode_r),
> - &fujitsu_hotkey->fifo_lock))
> - == sizeof(keycode_r)) {
> - input_report_key(input, keycode_r, 0);
> - input_sync(input);
> - vdbg_printk(FUJLAPTOP_DBG_TRACE,
> - "Pop keycode from ringbuffer [%d]\n",
> - keycode_r);
> - }
> - }
> +
> + if (keycode > 0)
> + acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_press(keycode);
> + else if (keycode == 0)
> + acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_release();
> }
>
> /* On some models (first seen on the Skylake-based Lifebook
> --
> 2.11.0
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists