[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f19cf35-94dc-187b-601a-aec337ba27f8@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:41:22 +0100
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>, airlied@...ux.ie,
daniel.vetter@...el.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] GPU hang with kernel 4.10rc3
On 12/01/17 10:21, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 07:03:25AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 11/01/17 18:08, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 05:33:34PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>> With kernel 4.10rc3 running as Xen dm0 I get at each boot:
>>>>
>>>> [ 49.213697] [drm] GPU HANG: ecode 7:0:0x3d1d3d3d, in gnome-shell
>>>> [1431], reason: Hang on render ring, action: reset
>>>> [ 49.213699] [drm] GPU hangs can indicate a bug anywhere in the entire
>>>> gfx stack, including userspace.
>>>> [ 49.213700] [drm] Please file a _new_ bug report on
>>>> bugs.freedesktop.org against DRI -> DRM/Intel
>>>> [ 49.213700] [drm] drm/i915 developers can then reassign to the right
>>>> component if it's not a kernel issue.
>>>> [ 49.213700] [drm] The gpu crash dump is required to analyze gpu
>>>> hangs, so please always attach it.
>>>> [ 49.213701] [drm] GPU crash dump saved to /sys/class/drm/card0/error
>>>> [ 49.213755] drm/i915: Resetting chip after gpu hang
>>>> [ 60.213769] drm/i915: Resetting chip after gpu hang
>>>> [ 71.189737] drm/i915: Resetting chip after gpu hang
>>>> [ 82.165747] drm/i915: Resetting chip after gpu hang
>>>> [ 93.205727] drm/i915: Resetting chip after gpu hang
>>>>
>>>> The dump is attached.
>>>
>>> That's a nasty one. The first couple of pages of the batchbuffer appear
>>> to be overwritten. (Full of 0xc2c2c2c2, i.e. probably pixel data.) That
>>> may be a concurrent write by either the GPU or CPU, or we may have
>>> incorrected mapped a set of pages. That it doesn't recovered suggests
>>> that the corruption occurs frequently, probably on every request/batch.
>>
>> I hoped someone would have an idea already.
>
> Sorry, first report of something like this in a long time (that I can
> remember at least). And the problem is that it can be anything from a
> coherency to a concurrency issue, so no one patch springs to mind.
> Thankfully it appears to be kernel related.
> -Chris
>
Bisecting took longer than I thought, but I had to cherry pick some
patches and rebase one of them multiple times...
Finally I found the commit to blame: 920cf4194954ec ("drm/i915:
Introduce an internal allocator for disposable private objects")
In case you need me to produce some more data or test a patch
feel free to reach out.
Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists