[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64b7bf49-57fc-32a9-17e4-1b26b99bff13@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 18:23:15 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 13/17] spi/topcliff-pch: Delete an unnecessary return
statement in two functions
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:57:03 +0100
The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful
Thus remove such statements here.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
drivers/spi/spi-topcliff-pch.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-topcliff-pch.c b/drivers/spi/spi-topcliff-pch.c
index 4bba39e70c7b..0a876311b67b 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-topcliff-pch.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-topcliff-pch.c
@@ -915,7 +915,6 @@ static void pch_spi_release_dma(struct pch_spi_data *data)
dma_release_channel(dma->chan_rx);
dma->chan_rx = NULL;
}
- return;
}
static void pch_spi_handle_dma(struct pch_spi_data *data, int *bpw)
@@ -1292,7 +1291,6 @@ static void pch_free_dma_buf(struct pch_spi_board_data *board_dat,
if (dma->rx_buf_dma)
dma_free_coherent(&board_dat->pdev->dev, PCH_BUF_SIZE,
dma->rx_buf_virt, dma->rx_buf_dma);
- return;
}
static void pch_alloc_dma_buf(struct pch_spi_board_data *board_dat,
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists