[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170113035307.GD9360@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:53:07 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
mhocko@...e.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Wait for oom_lock before retrying.
On (01/13/17 11:52), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
[..]
> and we really don't want to cond_resched() when we are in panic.
> that's why console_flush_on_panic() sets it to zero explicitly.
>
> console_trylock() checks oops_in_progress, so re-taking the semaphore
> when we are in
>
> panic()
> console_flush_on_panic()
> console_unlock()
> console_trylock()
>
> should be OK. as well as doing get_console_conditional_schedule() somewhere
> in console driver code.
d'oh... no, this is false. console_flush_on_panic() is called after we
bust_spinlocks(0), BUT with local IRQs disabled. so console_trylock()
would still set console_may_schedule to 0.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists